Light Stabilization Toolbox
by Dr. Adalbert Braig
March 1, 2010
UV
protection of coatings is today often regarded as a mature and well-established
technology. This may be true of certain traditional applications; however, the
increasing use of materials requiring coverage or enhanced protection at
specific wavelength ranges, along with novel resin technologies or low film
builds, has resulted in a variety of new light stabilizer developments that now
allow tunable protection from the UV to the near-visible range. Today, a wide
range of light stabilizers provides solutions both for water- and solvent-based
technologies, enabling paint companies to adjust the level of protection needed
to achieve top performance in their specific applications.
Following a short summary of the various UV absorber chemistries developed over
the years, both the absorption and the transmission characteristics of the
various classes (including combinations thereof) are discussed below. Depending
on the application and, in particular the sensitivity of the substrate used,
suitable spectral coverage, as well as sufficiently high extinction at certain
wavelengths (among other aspects), need to be recognized as important criteria
in the selection of stabilizers.
Conventional UV Absorbers for Coatings
The stabilization of coatings has for many years been
a challenge for the paint industry. More than three decades ago it became
evident that HALS (Hindered Amine Light
Stabilizers) play a key role in the
stabilization of polymers. Typically, these products are derivatives of
2’,2’,6’,6-tetra-methylpiperidine and act – once activated by UV-light and oxygen with formation
of the nitroxyl radical – as radical scavengers, thereby
preventing UV-light-induced degradation (cracking) of the polymer (coating).
The mode of action of HALS products is largely independent of the film build
applied; however, they do not absorb light at wavelengths above 250 nm.
Therefore, in many applications, combined use with UV absorbers is essential to
filter out the harmful components of UV light.
UV absorbers
predominantly protect the underlying substrate, which can be a colored basecoat
or plastic or wood. In contrast to HALS, the efficacy of UV absorbers depends
(according to the Lambert-Beer law) on the molecule-specific extinction
coefficient e, the concentration used and the film thickness
applied. Additional crucial properties include low volatility, high photo
stability, good compatibility and – depending on the spectral sensitivity of
the particular substrate – adequate spectral coverage.
Between the early 1970s and the 1990s a variety of UV absorber classes and
chemistries were developed and introduced to the market. The general structures
of these chemistries are shown in Figure 1. In the late 1970s, oxanilide UV
absorbers were already almost entirely replaced by various hydroxyphenyl
benzotriazoles (BTZ), which became the dominant UV absorber class during the
1980s and continue to be so for a variety of traditional applications. These
materials were already characterized by much broader spectral coverage and much
better photo stability. In spite of the dominant position of the hydroxyphenyl
benzotriazoles, there are still requirements that cannot be satisfactorily met
with these products due to certain technical limitations of their chemistry.
These include limited absorption at shorter wavelengths, interaction issues
with certain metal (e.g., Al-based) catalysts, leading to significant
yellowing, as well as inadequate protection of the substrate at reduced film
build. Development efforts in the 1990s resulted in the introduction of the
first generation of hydroxyphenyl triazine (HPT) UV absorbers (general
structure in Figure 1).
Generally
speaking, hydroxyphenyl triazines exhibit much less tendency to interact with
certain metal catalysts and even better photo stability than hydroxyphenyl
benzotriazoles, as well as high absorption at shorter wavelengths. These
features make this UV absorber class highly versatile in terms of both
traditional and advanced applications such as UV curing. Furthermore,
combinations with BTZ allow broader spectral coverage than HPT alone, along
with superior protection at short wavelengths versus BTZ alone.
The
comparative UV absorption spectra of the above classes as well as of a BTZ/HPT
combination (example 1:1 ratio) are shown in Figure 2 and the corresponding UV
transmission spectra in Figure 3.
Driving Forces for UV Absorber Innovation
Hydroxyphenyl
benzotriazoles and hydroxyphenyl triazines developed during the 1980s and 1990s
meet the requirements of the majority of traditional applications. Challenges
beyond these applications include optimization of film builds (i.e., thin film
applications) and increasing use of water-based coatings requiring compatible
UV absorbers without compromising on performance as well as of materials light
sensitive at wavelengths not covered by conventional UV absorbers.
Advanced Hydroxylphenyl Triazine UV Absorbers for Thin Film Applications
As
shown in Figure 2, conventional BTZ and HPT UV absorbers exhibit fairly similar
extinction, except in the 300 nm range. Adequate UV protection at low film
builds can therefore only be achieved through significantly higher dose levels,
which in turn may compromise the secondary properties of the paint
film.
The more recent development of advanced chromophores based on hydroxyphenyl
triazine chemistry has allowed up to 3.5 times higher extinction than the state
of the art. This extremely high extinction (Figure 4) allows the application of
thin films along with superior UV protection at comparatively low dose levels.
The position of the absorption maximum in the 320-330 nm range also makes these
chromophores interesting candidates for the protection of substrates sensitive
at this wavelength range, e.g., polycarbonate.
As mentioned earlier, the efficacy of a UV absorber depends both on its
absorption characteristics and on its secondary properties, such as photo
stability, which needs to be very high. This is particularly important in thin
film applications, where the product’s inherent stability rather than the
internal filter effect (i.e., UV absorber molecules protecting each other)
plays the dominant role.
Figure
5 shows the UV remission (i.e. reflectance) spectra of 2K clearcoats applied
over silver metallic basecoat at film builds of 20 µm and 40 µm respectively.
The spectra were recorded before and after 54 months Florida exposure. Despite
the higher film build applied, essentially zero absorption is recorded for the
hydroxyphenyl benzotriazole after long-term exposure. The spectra for the
advanced hydroxyphenyl triazine (HPT), however, are essentially identical,
which in turn can be interpreted as a result of its superior photo
stability.
The results of 54-month Florida tests with 2K
clearcoats (40 µm standard film build versus reduced film build; 20
µm) over both violet and silver
metallic basecoats are summarized in Figure 6. The results clearly show that
only the advanced hydroxyphenyl triazine technology allows superior protection
at low film builds, whereas delamination is observed in the presence of
conventional UV absorbers.
Red-Shifted UV Absorbers
The
spectral coverage as such, as well as the position of the absorption maximum,
are determining factors in UV stabilization of substrates sensitive at
wavelengths that are not, or not sufficiently, covered either by conventional
or advanced chromophores. These wavelengths extend from the ≥ 360 nm range to the visible and slightly
above.
A shift in the absorption spectrum of the UV absorber can be achieved to a
significant extent through specific substitution patterns; however, there are
obviously limitations both in terms of chemistry and color. The more the
spectrum is shifted towards the visible, the higher the risk of bringing in too
much color. This in turn means that a proper balance needs to be achieved
between the spectral coverage and the product’s inherent color.
Red-Shifted UV Absorbers for Wood Protection
As
described in previous publications(1,2), both UV and visible light
lead to decomposition of the lignin structure of wood, resulting in
discoloration/darkening of pale woods in particular. In order to filter out the
UV light component as far as possible, broader spectral coverage is needed than
can be achieved with conventional UV absorbers. Figure 7 shows the comparative
UV absorption spectra of a conventional hydroxyphenyl triazine (mono-resorcinol
triazine) versus a red-shifted tris-resorcinol triazine (TRITA). Modification
of the substitution pattern at the triazine moiety in this case allows a
significant shift of the absorption maximum from 290 nm to 360
nm.
As
indicated above, the decomposition of the lignin structure leads to formation
of colored chromophores. Figure 8 shows the relative intensity of the carbonyl
signal at 1730 cm-1 determined by FTIR analysis of pine samples. The
relative intensity is the intensity measured after Xenon-WOM exposure relative
to the intensity prior to exposure and correlates with the formation of new
chromophores, i.e., the higher the value, the more extensive the decomposition
of the lignin.
Cutting out the UV light either by cut-off filters (which allow a certain
wavelength range to be selectively cut out, i.e., a filter labeled GG 320
excludes all wavelengths below 320 nm, a filter labeled GG 385 excludes all
wavelengths below 385 nm, etc.) or by the red-shifted tris-resorcinol triazine
(TRITA) UV absorber in lieu of a filter can greatly reduce the formation of
colored chromophores (Figure 8). Since such species, however, are also being
formed in the visible range, sufficient protection can scarcely be achieved by
the UV absorber alone. In order to fully prevent their formation, spectral
coverage as far out as > 450 nm would be needed (Figure 8), which in turn
would result in a major color impact by the UV absorber.
Therefore, a modified concept involving
specific co-stabilization was developed. Such co-stabilizers, which are
chemically based on free nitroxyl radical chemistry (Figure 8), are typically
used for pretreatment purposes. Such materials can trap the radicals formed on
the wood surface by the visible light, thereby preventing photooxidation of
lignin.
Figure 9 shows how the above concept is applied to
clear-coated pine wood. After 1000 h Xenon-WOM exposure, the non-stabilized
sample exhibits severe darkening. UV stabilization of the clear coat with TRITA
can already greatly reduce the discoloration observed. If combined with lignin
stabilizer, discoloration is further minimized.
Highly Red-Shifted UV Absorbers for Protection of CFRM and Epoxy Matrix
Novel
substrates such as carbon-fiber-reinforced materials (CFRMs) are increasingly
being used in a variety of applications, including automotive parts and hang-on
parts for motor bikes, sports items such as bikes, the aerospace industry and
rotor blades for wind turbines. CFRMs are characterized by low weight and
superior mechanical properties. In order to achieve these properties, the
carbon fiber is typically embedded in an aromatic epoxy
matrix.
Systems or composites based on aromatic polymers (e.g., CFRMs) are inherently
light sensitive, unless covered by pigmented coatings. The application of
exposed carbon fiber, for example as a design element (CFRM coated with
clearcoat only), is therefore highly challenging from a UV protection point of
view. Fundamental studies conducted by means of cut-off filters (Figure 10),
which allow certain wavelength ranges to be selectively cut out, show that the
critical wavelengths include both the UV (i.e., 280 – 380 nm) and the 400
nm range.
Figure
11 shows the results of the determination of the spectral sensitivity of CFRMs
by means of cut-off filters. In the experiments, the substrates were coated
with 2K PU clearcoats stabilized with HALS only. The specimens were
subsequently exposed for 4000 h in the Xenon-WOM, followed by humidity and
adhesion tests.
The results clearly indicate that spectral coverage as far out as ~400 nm is
mandatory in order to prevent degradation of the underlying epoxy
matrix.
UV protection of such substrates requires UV absorbers
(RUVA) with pronounced absorption into the visible (along with minimal color
impact), sufficiently high extinction in the 400 nm range and superior photo
stability. Figure 12 shows the UV transmission spectra recorded at different
dose levels and a film build typical for coated CFRM. The results indicate that
the critical wavelengths can be fully covered at dose levels between 1 and 2%
based on the solids content of the clearcoat.
This has been confirmed in independent and comparative
experiments conducted with RUVA-containing clearcoats versus conventionally
stabilized clearcoats (Figure 13). The application of conventional UV absorbers
results in early failure (delamination) after only 2000 h Xenon-WOM exposure
due to the insufficient spectral coverage provided. In the presence of RUVA,
however, superior protection is achieved. No signs of delamination or
discoloration are observed even after 5000 h Xenon-WOM exposure. This in turn
opens the door for new applications, e.g., the use of CFRMs as a design
element.
Conclusion
The
range of UV absorbers available today includes both conventional and advanced
UV absorber technology. In traditional applications conventional hydroxyphenyl
benzotriazoles as well as hydroxylphenyl triazines will certainly continue to
play an important role. These products, however, do not meet the requirements
for thin film applications or for applications requiring enhanced or specific
protection at certain wavelengths. Development work has led to an extension of
the available product range beyond conventional technologies, thereby allowing
applications previously considered difficult or even impossible. Advanced
hydroxyphenyl triazines are closing the gap for thin film applications or
applications where enhanced protection at shorter wavelengths is necessary.
Superior protection of wood substrates can be achieved by a specific concept,
i.e., the combined use of red-shifted triazine-based UV absorbers and lignin
stabilizers. Protection of systems or composites based on aromatic epoxies can be
considered the biggest challenge in terms of the UV absorber properties needed.
Today this can be realized through novel red-shifted UV absorber technology,
which combines comparatively low color with broad spectral coverage reaching
into the near visible.
Furthermore, the application of the various
products as such or combinations thereof allow paint companies to adjust the
protection to the level needed. In water-based coatings – although not further
discussed in this paper – this is achieved through specific water- compatible
product forms.
This article is based on the presentation “Light Stabilization Toolbox –
tunable protection from UV to near visible,” given at the European Coatings
Congress, 2009, in Nuremberg, Germany, by Adalbert Braig, BASF SE.
|