Paint & Coatings Industry
 HOME
 Subscribe
 E-Newsletter Subscription
 E-Newsletter Archive
 Subscription Customer Service
 Digital Editions
 China Digital Editions
 Finishing Today Digital Editions
 SUPPLIER INFO
 Ad Index
 Buyers Guide
 Online Exhibits
 Virtual Coatings Brochures
 Supplier Price Alerts
 Supplier Request Form
 Videos/PCI TV
 MAGAZINE
 PCI 25
 Top Global Leaders
 Calendar of Events
 Features
 Company News
 Industry News
 Names in the News
 Products
 RESOURCES
 Archives
 Finishing Today Archives
 Bookstore
 Classified Ads
 Job Search
 Industry Links
 Market Research
 PCI INFO
 Contact Us
 Media Kit
 PCI EVENTS
 Coatings Trends & Technologies
 Powder Coating Forum
 Webinars
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Innovative Testing Technologies for Effect Finishes
by Gabriele Kigle-Boeckler
Sandra Weixel
February 1, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Special-effect finishes are used in many applications to create new color impressions, pronouncing the design of a product and at the same time making the product appear alive. The color impression of effect finishes can not only change under different viewing angles but can also look different depending on the lighting conditions.

Therefore, new generations of special-effect pigments can no longer sufficiently be described with traditional multi-angle color measurement quantifying the diffused light reflection at 3 to 5 angles. This paper presents new technologies that were developed to objectively describe the total impression of color – multi-angle color and effect changes (sparkle – graininess) as well as paint defects such as “cloudiness - mottling”.


Introduction

Special-effect coatings play a dominant role in a variety of applications (automotive, appliances, electronics, cosmetics, etc.) as they make an object distinctively appealing. Designers are looking for a new color, which not only makes the product look pretty, but actually underlines its styling resulting in a “living” color! Pigment manufacturers are developing new colors that not only change their look under different viewing angles, but also look different under different lighting conditions (i.e., sunny sky and cloudy sky). Again the goal is to make the product appear alive and exciting. In contrast to conventional solid colors, metallic finishes change their appearance with viewing and lighting conditions. Interference colors and special-effect colors show not only a lightness change with viewing angle, but also a chroma and hue change. And, in the latest development of special-effect pigments, additional special sparkling effects are created by changing the lighting conditions from cloudy to sunlight.

On the other hand, color harmony, i.e., a uniform and consistent color, is essential to achieve the impression of a high-quality finish and avoid customer complaints. Most of the time a final product consists of several components produced by various suppliers, thus color uniformity is becoming more of a challenge to the entire supply chain.


Effect Coatings Color Measurement

The first types of effect pigments used were aluminium flakes, creating a “metallic” look. Dependent on the viewing angle they show a light-dark flop. The larger the lightness difference is between the viewing angles, the more the curved profile of an object will be accentuated (Figure 1).



To objectively describe this light-dark flop effect, measurements have to be done at different angles (Figure 2). It was determined that a minimum of three and best five viewing angles are needed to provide sufficient information on the goniophotometric characteristics of a metallic finish. The measurement geometry for multi-angle measurement is specified by aspecular angles. The aspecular angle is the viewing angle measured from the specular direction in the illuminator plane.


The angle is positive when measured from the specular direction toward the normal direction. Later, pearlescent pigments were introduced that show not only a lightness change with viewing angle, but also a chroma and hue change caused by the interference of light (Figure 3).



For the new generation of those pigments the color even travels over a wider range, i.e., through several quadrants in color space (Figure 4). Quite often the color shift can be noticed on the opposite side of the specular reflection (or “behind the gloss”). This effect can no longer sufficiently be described with traditional multi-angle color measurement quantifying the diffused light reflection at three or five angles.


Research has shown that by adding at least one additional measurement angle at -15° “behind the gloss” correlation to the visual assessment can be improved tremendously (Figure 5).


Effect Measurement of Effect Coatings

Metallic and interference pigments not only change their color impression dependent on the viewing angle, but also dependent on the lighting condition – direct sunlight versus cloudy sky. This effect cannot be captured with conventional multi-angle color instruments, because they measure the integral of the spectral reflection over the detected area and cannot distinguish between the basecoat color and the reflection of the effect pigments.

Under diffused illumination (cloudy sky) a metallic finish can create a light/dark pattern depending on the aluminum flake size from very fine to very coarse (Figure 6). Commonly used terms to describe the phenomenon are graininess, coarseness, texture or salt and pepper. The effect is only obvious at a close distance and does not change with viewing angle. Graininess can vary with the flake size, the orientation of the flakes in the coating, and with agglomeration of flakes during the application process.



Under direct illumination (sunlight) the same metallic or effect finish can look completely different (Figure 7). Small light flashes can be seen with low to high intensity. This effect is also referred to as sparkle, micro-brightness, glint or diamonds. Sparkle is caused by the reflectivity of the flakes and therefore is influenced by the flake type (aluminum flake, mica, Xirallic®), the concentration level of the effect pigments, flake size or application method (bell/bell versus bell/pneumatic). In contrast to graininess, the sparkle effect is very dependent on the illumination angle.


Total Color Impression Measurement

To characterize the impression of effect finishes under different viewing angles and illumination conditions, a new instrument is available from BYK-Gardner that combines the following characteristics.
  • Multi-angle color measurement “before and behind the specular reflection” to give better insights on the true color travel capabilities of an effect color.

  • Effect measurement of sparkle and graininess simulating the effect changes under cloudy sky and bright sunlight.

To measure sparkle and graininess, the instrument is equipped with a digital camera, which correlates to the spatial resolution of the human eye. The camera takes pictures under various lighting conditions. Diffused illumination by a white-coated hemisphere is used to simulate a cloudy sky condition for measuring graininess. Direct illumination at three angles is used to measure the sparkle impression under direct sunlight (Figures 8 and 9).



In order to obtain numerical values that can be used for daily process control and QC purposes, the camera pictures are analyzed with algorithms that were established based on visual evaluations of a variety of automotive finishes together with several partners from the automotive, pigment and paint industry.

To allow a better differentiation, the impression of sparkle is described by a two-dimensional system: sparkle area and sparkle intensity. A sparkle tolerance model was developed, which allows setting a “Delta Sparkle” value for paint batch or part QC. The calculation of the “Delta Sparkle” value is related to the color difference calculation of Delta Ecmc and was tested by several automotive makers and paint suppliers in visual correlation studies.

Graininess is evaluated by measuring the uniformity of light and dark areas and is summarized in one graininess value. A graininess value of zero would indicate a solid color, the higher the value the grainier or coarser the sample looks under diffused light.


Color and Effect Applications

Aluminum Flake Size Influence
Silver finishes with three different aluminum flake sizes (25 µm, 34 µm, 54 µm) were compared for color and effect change. In multi-angle color measurement the flake size influence can be mainly seen in lightness changes (Figure 10 - Flop Index).



Visually, the silver finish with the coarser aluminum pigments appears much more “grainy” under diffused lighting conditions and more “sparkling” under direct illumination. The BYK-mac measurement correlates with the visual judgment: sparkling area, sparkling intensity as well as the graininess are increasing with the flake size (Figure 11).

Application Method Influence on Flake Orientation
In order to increase paint efficiency, the application method for the basecoat is being changed to 100% electrostatic application. Especially on metallic finishes containing coarser aluminum flakes the flake orientation will be different – more non-parallel oriented flakes. The result can be less of a light-dark flop effect and more sparkling at low grazing illumination angle.



In another example the basecoat of the car body was applied 100% electrostatically and the bumpers were still painted with the traditional bell/pneumatic application. The total color difference using the color difference calculation Delta EDIN was acceptable evaluating on the averaged Delta EDIN value (Figure 12).



Visually, one could see a difference mainly at a low grazing illumination angle, whereas the car body was sparkling considerably more than the bumper. The BYK-mac measurement data reflects the visual impression clearly evaluating the Sparkle 75° data. The Sparkle 75° measurement evaluates the aluminum flakes, which are non-parallel oriented; therefore the main changes can be seen in an increasing sparkle area (Figure 13).



Effect Pigment Type Influence on Color and Effect
A black effect finish with a concentration of 0.3% Xirallic was compared to the same finish with 0.3% Mica. In regard to traditional 5-angle color measurement the two finishes would be acceptable (Figure 14).



Visually, there is a big difference when the panels are exposed to direct sunlight. The finish containing Xirallic has a much higher sparkling effect than the finish with Mica pigments. The sparkle measurement shows a clear difference at 15° illumination. The finish with the Xirallic pigments shows a much higher intensity value than the finish using Mica pigments (Figure 15).

Sparkle and Graininess for Daily QC
Sparkle and graininess are essential parameters for automotive applications to achieve a harmonized look over the entire car body including add-on parts.

Figure 16 shows an example of an anthracite color with a poor sparkle match between add-on parts and car body: all measurements taken on the add-on parts were outside the sparkle tolerance ellipse.


Figure 17 on the other hand shows a very good match of a brilliant pearl red. All readings are within the sparkle tolerance.

The differences in Sparkle 15°, 45°, 75° and/or graininess can also assist in trouble shooting to determine whether the cause of a mismatch is due to formulation or process differences.


Color Measurement Outlook and Challenges of Tomorrow: Cloudiness

An additional factor influencing total color impression is an effect called cloudiness or mottling. Cloudiness is a lightness variation that is most obvious on light metallic finishes. It is a very undesirable effect that is quite obvious on large body panels. It can be caused by formulation as well as application variations. The main influencing parameter is flake disorientation, which can be caused, for example, by formulation incompatibilities or film thickness variations during the basecoat application. The result will be small and/or large clouds (lightness variations) resulting in an inhomogeneous appearance. Depending on the viewing distance, small clouds (close up evaluation) or large clouds (far distance evaluation) (Figure 18) can be seen.

In order to objectively measure the mottling effect it is necessary to measure lightness variations over a large sample area. BYK-Gardner is introducing a new solution to scan the surface over a large area and objectively measure the lightness variations at three different viewing angles to simulate the visual evaluation of cloudiness (Figure 19).



The measurement signal (Figure 20) is filtered via mathematical filter functions in different cloud sizes and a “rating” value calculated for each cloud size (Figure 21). The higher the rating value the more visible the mottling effect.



Currently, automotive companies are working on setting cloudiness values for batch approval and process control.


Conclusion

The introduction of more new effect pigments requires new innovative measurement technologies to capture the total color impression. It is no longer sufficient to measure the color impression only under different viewing angles, but also the effect of different lighting conditions needs to be evaluated. Colors that agree with each other when measured for 5-angle color can look very different due to sparkle and graininess differences. The objective measurement of the total color harmony of products with special effects coatings is now possible with the development of new innovative technologies implemented in the BYK-Gardner BYK-mac.

This instrument fills a need for effect measurement that has not been available until now. The BYK-mac uses multi-angle color measurement at six angles, and also uses multi-angle camera evaluation of sparkle and graininess to give a complete picture of the visual impression of the effect coating. The new sparkle and graininess measurement data can be used for trouble shooting to determine the cause of a mismatch as well as for daily quality control.


Sandra Weixel
Product Manager, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Wesel, Germany

Gabriele Kigle-Boeckler
Business Manager, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Wesel, Germany

References
1.  Baba, G.; Kondo, A.; and Mori, E. “Goniometric Colorimetry”, Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the AIC, Vol. II, 213, Buenos Aires (1989).
2. Alman, D.H. “Directional Color Measurement of Metallic Flake Finishes”, Proceedings of the ISCC Williamsburg Conference on Appearance, 53 (1987).
3. Schmelzer, H. “Farbmessung und Rezeptberechnung bei Metallic-Automobillacken”, Proceedings of the 18th FATIPEC Congress, Vol. I (B), 607 (1986).
4. Saris, H.J.A.; Gottenbos, R.J.B.; van Houwelingen, H. “Correlation between Visual and Instrumental Colour Differences of Metallic Paint Films.
5. ASTM Standard E 2194 - 03, Multiangle Color Measurement of metal Flake Pigmented Materials.
6. DIN 6175-2, Farbtoleranzen für Automobillackierungen, Teil 2: Effektlackierungen.
7. ASTM Task force E 12.12.06 – WK 1164, Standard practice for Multiangle Color Measurement, Identification, and Characterization of Interference Pigments (draft).
8.  Kirchner, E.J.J.; van den Kieboom, G.J.; Njo, S.L.; Super, R.; Gottenbos, R. “ The Appearance of Metallic and Pearlescent Materials”, COLOR research and applications, 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy