LONDON - The British Parliament had a debate on how to create a circular economy for leftover decorative paint in the UK. The debate focused on the British Coatings Federation’s (BCF) PaintCare program, the industry-led initiative that aims to create ways to deal with leftover paint in the UK. Lawmakers looked at what is needed to stimulate a market for remanufactured paint, including changing the specification for use of remanufactured paint in government painting contracts, and how government could enable an increase in the number of Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRCs) in the UK that accept paint.

PaintCare was started by the BCF to make better use of the 55 million liters of paint leftover each year in the UK, most of which ends up landfilled or incinerated once disposed. Since 2014, the program has been working with industry and government to create a solution for leftover decorative paint in the UK which, if implemented nationally, presents a 40% cost saving to local government per year, and the diversion of leftover paint from landfill and incineration into reuse and remanufacturing. One of the challenges to the program is creating an end-market to absorb the 20 million liters of leftover paint that is suitable for reuse and remanufacturing. To help stimulate the market for remanufactured paint, PaintCare is calling on government to stipulate 5% of government painting contracts use a significant percentage of remanufactured paint.

Another challenge is that only one in three HWRCs currently accepts paint. There are a variety of issues faced by HWRCs when taking on a paint recycling service, including cost and on-site space implications. In response, PaintCare is asking government for more support to help expand the HWRC network across the country.

Debate sponsor Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stockbridge, said, “I am proud to support the coatings industry in their innovative leftover paint initiative. The PaintCare project is attempting to turn an environmental threat into an opportunity by working towards a systematic approach to collecting and sorting waste paint and will make the remanufacturing of paint from waste products a more viable economic process. Paint manufacturers are doing their bit; government must now step up and play their part too. After all, many companies of all sizes are demonstrating their willingness to invest in this sector and in solutions. Several million pounds has already been invested in commercial ventures and in supporting social enterprises.”

Regarding the debate, BCF’s Chief Executive Tom Bowtell said, “I was encouraged to see such wide support from MPs to push for solutions to the leftover paint problem, and Angela Smith MP articulated the case very clearly. It was very disappointing that the solutions proposed, to have government help stimulate a wider market for leftover paint via green government procurement, was dismissed by the Minister of Waste Therese Coffey MP, given that this would actually have helped reduce the cost of managing leftover paint. The Minister’s assumption that implementing Extended Producer Responsibility will help stop leftover paint being generated is simply wrong – evidence from other countries shows that paint continues to be leftover even with EPR, as it is inevitable that consumers won’t use up all the paint they buy. We want a sustainable solution to the problem that stimulates paint remanufacturing and creates end markets for leftover paint, which is the major challenge faced by the fledgling paint recycling programs in place today.”